The Court is said to be the arbiter of justice and order. Knowing that
justice is largely subjective, one is therefore tempted to test or
interrogate how the Court achieves or grasps such a concept for the
purpose of practical application. This adventure is undoubtedly
interesting as it exposes one to how the Court arrive at certain
seemingly interesting decisions. This paper takes the view that
language, logic, and law are the three devices that the Court apply in
its quest to ascertain justice when parties submit disputes before it.